PL MINUTES 01201998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes • January 20, 1998 Page 7 1 Commissioner Gondorchin stated the reason he questioned the requirement was in relation to 2 potential conflict between the residents who will parking and driving behind the building. 3 Beyond that, he believed this would be a handsome addition to the area. 4 Motion by Commissioner Gondorchin, seconded by Commissioner Thompson, to recommend 5 approval of the subdivision of property located at 3301 Stinson Boulevard per the reasons 6 detailed in the City Staff recommendations as follows: 7 1. It meets all the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 8 2. The project is well suited for the area; and 9 3. That this takes into consideration those points detailed in the City Attorney's letter dated 10 January 19, 1998; and, 11 Conditioned on: 12 1. Confirmation that the lot coverage issue is satisfied. 13 14 Motion carried unanimously. Chair Bergstrom noted this request will be considered by the City Council at their January 27, 1998 meeting. 17 3. Conditional Use Permit- Autumn Woods. 18 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:40 P.M. 19 Ms. Moore-Sykes reported City Staff has received a request from Rose Fitzjerrells, Manager of 20 Autumn Woods of St. Anthony for a Conditional Use Permit to provide an on-site beauty salon 21 for resident use. The management group'of Autumn Woods is proposing to convert a whirlpool 22 room into a one-station beauty salon for the sole use of the residents. 23 Section 1630.03, ( c) of the City Ordinance states that within an R-4 Zoning District, a service or 24 convenience type businesses, including beauty shops which exists in and catering to the residents 25 of an apartment or condominium building or complex, which does not exceed 1,000 square feet 26 in size and provided there is no advertising or signing on the exterior of the building or in any 27 yard. Minnesota statutes and City Ordinances require that the proposed conditional use is one 28 that is specifically listed for the zoning district in which it is to be located; that the proposed 29 conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing 30 or working in the area or injurious to property values or improvements in the vicinity; and that 31 the proposed use is necessary or desirable at the above location. Based on the information provided to Staff by the applicant, the proposed use meets State and City requirements.