PL PACKETS 10191999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

V Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 Page 3 1 Bergstrom stated that he would be opposed to the project if all aspects were considered impervi- 2 ous surfaces. He would prefer decking as opposed to a surface such as brick; however, 3 Bergstrom would appreciate clarification on the issue of decking being considered an impervious 4 surface. 5 Chair Bergstrom introduced Jay Hartman, Public Works Director, and invited him to address the 6 Commission. 7 Horst asked Mr. Hartman his opinion whether a deck would be considered an impervious 8 surface. Mr. Hartman stated he was not aware of the history of the City's ordinance, but would 9 agree with Bergstrom that a deck would more amenable as opposed to a hard surface, such as a 10 patio. 11 Horst said he would consider exploring options in order to find a solution for the Doolans, but he 12 also felt the Commission needed to be sensitive to the City's flooding issues. 13 Mrs. Doolan clarified that the runoff from their property does not flow into the street, but into 14 vegetation planted in their front yard. 15 Horst stated that if the Commission gives consideration to construction of a deck, a utility should 16 be implemented for directing runoff. 17 Hatch mentioned the possibility of a pervious surface such as gravel. Mrs. Doolan responded 18 that would be a viable option. 19 Horst suggested polling the other Commissioners regarding granting a variance. 20 Tillman said alternatives should be available for Mr. and Mrs. Doolan, yet still address the 21 concern about water runoff. 22 Melsha asked if constructing both a patio and a deck were reasonable because both structures 23 take up a significant amount of space. 24 Stille said it is a difficult situation because the structure.was built before the Code was in place 25 and he would like to allow fellow citizens the opportunity to build a deck. On the other hand,the 26 property is useable in its current condition and there does not appear to be a hardship to justify 27 granting a variance. Stille wondered if a compromise was possible. 28 Horst said the discussion should be centered around whether the Planning Commission wishes to 29 recommend to the City Council that a variance be granted for a noncompliance structure that has 30 been grandfathered into the Code. Horst mentioned that this issue could arise again with other 31 homeowners.