My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 01111977
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1977
>
CC MINUTES 01111977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:03:56 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:03:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
35
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1977
SP Name
CC MINUTES 01111977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
either the existing sign ordinance or anticipated changes in the <br /> ordinance and it was therefore the Board 's recommendation that a <br /> • variance to the sign ordinance not be a part of any approval of the <br /> building itself. <br /> Brian Morgan, 105 Peavy Building, representing Baker Associates who <br /> are architects for TCF, wished to defer comments on the sign to Mr. <br /> Solberg of TCF who had not yet arrived. 11r. '[organ then presented <br /> the site, parking, landscaping, building and lighting Plans for the <br /> proposed branch office of TCF. He pointed out the differences between <br /> the 72 x 112 two story building which TCF had anticipated building in <br /> 1975 and the one story building which will be 21 feet in height for <br /> which TCF is now requesting final approval. He said the suggestions <br /> made by the Planning Board regarding moving the building over 4 or 5 <br /> feet to accomodate the canopy over the drive in tellers and the changes <br /> in driveway configuration and traffic flow as well as the widening <br /> of the parking spaces from 9 to 10 feet had been incorporated into <br /> the plans he now presented. These included landscaping plans and Mr. <br /> Morgan described the various types of trees and plantings which are <br /> proposed; specifically, those which will serve as a buffer for the <br /> residential neighborhood to the east. He told Councilman Haik there <br /> would be no fencing includee in this buffer. Brochures were provided <br /> which illustrated the tyre of lighting planned for the .project and <br /> the architect accentuated the low level intensity of this lighting. <br /> Mr. Morgan then said TCF was willing to provide the sidewalk along <br /> 39th which had been included as a provision of the Board 's recommenda- <br /> • tion if that sidewalk was continued east on 39th Avenue N.F. There <br /> was then a discussion of the Board ' s basis for recommending this side- <br /> walk with no provision for a walkway along_ Silver Lake Road which <br /> Council members indicated they had always anticipated would be erected <br /> in that area. <br /> Neil Solberg of TCF then arrived and said TCF was reluctant to provide <br /> sidewalks which are not continuous because they would probably not be <br /> used and explained that the bank anticipated that the remainder of <br /> the property which they own to the south of the site would eventually <br /> have another h,iilcding such as a clinic on it. <br /> The Council and Planning Board representatives were concerned that <br /> there be some provision made for a "boarding/waiting pad" to accomodate <br /> bus Passengers who board at that corner. <br /> Mayor Miedtke pointed out the fact that it is in the power of the <br /> Council to require a sidewalk be provided any time ' it is deemed neces- <br /> sary and said he felt it would be more ecuntimicei rur _cr zq .i,,civaqr_ <br /> the walkway in its consLructi.on pla,is than to be assessed for it <br /> later. <br /> Motion by Councilman Sauer and seconded by Mayor Viedtke to grant final <br /> approval to the plans as presented by TCF for a 68 square foot branch <br /> office building to be erected on Lots 8 , 9 , 10 (except the east 60 <br /> feet thereof) Block. 7, Mounds View Acres , 2nd Addition with the stipu- <br /> lations set by the Planning Board as amended., except that the addition- <br /> al sidewalk will not be required until Ramsey County provides a walkway <br /> (2) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.