Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br /> • , Mr. Doug Jones of 2505 Silver :_are asked zhe following questions: "If someone <br /> in St. Anthony sold their home for $25430;000 would they be qualified to rent <br /> • one of these units? What additional cos*s would the Village incur as a result <br /> of this project, i.e, fire equipment, e--.;c. ?" <br /> Woodington: The first fill-up of the building, anyone would qualify (over 62 <br /> years of age). After that preference must go to thooe who fall within the <br /> lower income area. <br /> Mr. Roger Tobias of 3127. 3;th Avenue presented the Planning Board with a petition <br /> in regard to this proposal. 57 households were represented. The petition was <br /> in objection to this proposal. Mr. Tobias read the petition which enumerated <br /> the ordinances which would require variances if this were to be built on a MD <br /> basis. <br /> Mr. Bratiand pointed out the project -would not be built on a MD basis, but on a <br /> ;.U,P, therefore, those ordinances would not necessarily require variances. <br /> Woodington: Every comm:tnity we (Rembrandt) go into, we have had to apply for <br /> either a new ordinance, variances of those ordinances or C.U.P. because <br /> communities have not provided, until this time, for housing for elderly. <br /> For general Information: The units proposed are substantially larger than the <br /> size recom-aended by HUD. Heritage is a limited dividen sponsor cannot earn over <br /> 6% on our cash investment, if we dr,, we muaz turn thai-, money ovor to HUD. <br /> Mr. Myron Budynski of 3913' renro:A' asked the total green space on the two plans. <br /> Plan A. five story building on fcur lots would provide 45,320 sq. ft. green <br /> • space, ana Plan B would p:ovi.de 52,015 sq. fz. green space. <br /> Mr. Dudynski stated "I don't see how a five scoiy building could fit well into <br /> a l; story neighborhood. What would happen to the value of the homes presently <br /> in that, neighborhood?" <br /> Woodington: It is mJ feeling that there will be no diminishing value on those <br /> homes. <br /> Mr. Dudynski presented the Planning Board with a clipping from the December 14th <br /> Star & Tribune which stated that New Brighton had turned down a proposal by <br /> Rembrandt for housing for elderly with 96 units on 2? acres due to lack of <br /> sufficient Free.. He pointed out that they were requesting more than 96 units <br /> in St. Anthony on a comparable piece of acreage. <br /> Woodington: Heri•cage had other problems in New Brighton which were not stated <br /> in the article. `-Te wanted tc locate next to a gravel pit which we wanted to <br /> purchase from New Brighton, the village would not sell, and HUD would not allow <br /> us to buy next to a gravel pit. The density was mucky larger than stated, there <br /> were more than 96 units. <br /> Mr. Dudynski (directing auestion to Bratland) "There are several items stated in <br /> the C.U.P. ordinance which must present before P C.U.P. may be granted, am I <br /> correct?" <br /> Bratland: Ycs <br /> l <br />