Laserfiche WebLink
August 28, 2017 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />proposed stalls is well below the city code requirement of 2 stalls per unit, staff is <br />requesting information regarding best practices for the provision of parking at other <br />recent development sites in the vicinity and more data to support allowing a reduction <br />in the parking spaces required. <br /> Area breakdown by use. Similar to the table provided with the existing conditions <br />exhibit, staff would like the Applicant to provide a table showing the areas associated <br />with each proposed use of the development. This table would include the square <br />footage associated with each type of residential (market, affordable, townhome, and <br />senior), streets, trails and sidewalks, public use and/or open space. This should also <br />include the estimated number of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom apartments proposed, by <br />building. <br /> Staging detail. Staff is requesting a more detailed estimate of the timeline associated <br />with each stage of the development. There is an understanding that uncertainty exists <br />with development timing; however, staff would like a better understanding of the <br />expecting duration of each stage of development. <br /> Revised Plans for Building E. Since a new developer is now involved, revised plans for <br />Building E and the surrounding site are requested. As proposed, Building E (which <br />contains the affordable housing associated with this project) is physically isolated from <br />the remainder of the site by a large retaining wall and a bioretention area. There are no <br />internal roadway or sidewalk connections to other site buildings or features, including <br />the park and open space areas, and there is both a parking lot and retaining wall that act <br />as a separation cutting off the building from the development overall. The design of this <br />building could be better incorporated into the site plan and could be integrated into <br />overall development in a more inclusive way with the addition of a trail. Grading <br />changes are required to eliminate or reduce the grade change between Building B and <br />D. <br /> Vacation of Easement. There is currently a watermain easement through the site, which <br />will need to be vacated through a separate action accompanying a final plat. <br /> Engineering Comments. The full engineering staff report is available as an attachment. <br /> There appear to be many outstanding questions and concerns with the <br />stormwater management systems, especially as it relates to the rest of the site. <br />Resolution of these questions and issues will require coordination with City <br />Engineer. <br /> An erosion control must be submitted and reviewed. <br /> Soil borings and logs must be submitted and reviewed. <br /> Details on the operations and maintenance of the privately held stormwater <br />facilities will be required to be enumerated in the development agreement. <br />15