Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 10, 2018 <br />Page 2 <br />III. <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 IV <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />V <br />CONSENT AGENDA. <br />A. Approval of March 27, 2018, City Council Meeting Minutes. <br />B. Licenses and Permits. <br />C. Claims. <br />D. Resolution 18 -032. a Resolution Acceptine Donations and Grants Received in the 15` <br />Quarter of 2018. <br />Motion by Councilmember Jenson, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to approve the Consent <br />Agenda items. <br />Motion carried 5 -0. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS — NONE. <br />REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF - NONE. <br />A. Resolution 18 -033 a resolution approving a variance to add a 372 so. ft. sunroom to the <br />back of the home at 3421 Skycroft Drive. <br />Planning Commissioner Jedd Larson reviewed the City Code requirements for setbacks. The <br />Code requires a rear yard setback of 25 feet. Mr. Larson noted the applicable codes. The <br />applicants (Thomas and Jennifer Gille) is requesting a variance to construct a sunroom that <br />would encroach into the required rear yard setback to result in a rear yard depth of 7' and 5/8" <br />feet. The property location was indicated on a map. The Applicant's request for a variance from <br />the rear yard setback to allow for the construction of a sunroom is reasonable, per the findings <br />listed in the City Code. Staff and the Plan recommends approval of the variance to encroach into <br />the rear yard setback. <br />A public hearing was held on March 26, 2018 and no one spoke for or against the request. The <br />Planning Commission recommended approval of the application unanimously. <br />Mr. Larson reviewed the criteria for and Consistency with Criteria for Variance Approval. All <br />applicable criterion was met with the exception of b. The plight of the property owner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the property owner — the plight of the <br />property owner is due to the placement, construction proposed, and overall square footage of the <br />proposed deck design. The lot is platted and home placement on the lot is relative to others in the <br />general area. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked how this differs from other encroachments on setbacks within the <br />City. Mr. Larson showed an overhead map of the property and noted the setback is different <br />because it faces Skycroft Drive rather than Skycroft Circle. The neighbors to the north have <br />nearly the same addition as requested. <br />Mr. Gille was present but did not choose to address the Council as the presentation covered the <br />request. <br />