My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 09102019
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2019
>
CC PACKET 09102019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2019 12:07:23 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 9:22:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 20, 2019 <br />Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />In this regard, there is reliable research from the Institute of Transportation Engineers <br />(ITE) in its “Parking Generation” manual as to the number of parking spaces required for <br />suburban multiple family buildings with access to transit. There is extensive transit <br />coverage in the Silver Lake Village area, and Metro Transit is currently working on <br />enhancing its transit stop capacity along Silver Lake Road. <br /> <br />For such developments, a parking requirement equal to one parking space per .9 <br />bedrooms can predict actual parking demand. The total number of bedrooms in the 464 <br />unit project is 602, based on the projected unit mix (described below). The proposed 813 <br />parking spaces results in a ratio of 1.35 spaces per bedroom, which should be more than <br />enough to serve the project. <br /> <br />The ITE manual also projects parking demand by unit count, with a peak accumulation for <br />projects of this type at about 1.4 spaces per unit. This would result in a demand of <br />approximately 650 parking spaces. <br /> <br />As noted previously, the Planning Commission included a consideration that parking be <br />further examined to entertain the possibility that the total parking coverage could be <br />lessened, thereby increasing green space on the site. In reviewing this option, it appears <br />that total parking demand may turn out to be somewhat less than the proposed supply. <br />However, this is based on the average of a variety of other studies which have a wide <br />variation in actual demand. While the parking supply may be greater than eventual <br />demand for this project, it is speculative to reduce the proposed parking availability. Staff <br />does not recommend reducing the supply below that proposed, which is already a <br />reduction from code requirements. As noted below, the green space on the site will be <br />increased over the current condition, even with the parking supply as proposed. <br /> <br />Dimensional Requirements. According to the Ordinance, off-street parking spaces must <br />measure not less that 9 feet in width and 19 feet in depth. While all surface parking stalls <br />are shown to appropriately measure 9 feet in width, stall depths of 18 feet are proposed. <br />This dimension is generally considered functional, but will require attention from the <br />management during winter season due to snow plowing and accumulation. If possible <br />given site dimensions, 19 foot depth parking stalls would be a better design. <br /> <br />Disabled Parking. According to the American Disability Act, required accessible spaces (for <br />persons with disabilities) varies by the number of spaces in a parking lot. For parking lots <br />which provide 501 to 1,000 spaces, two percent of the spaces must be devoted to use by <br />disabled persons. For 813 parking spaces for example, a minimum of 17 disabled spaces <br />are required. <br /> <br />The parking plan for the parking garage has not, to date been provided. Thus, it is not <br />possible to identify the total number of disabled parking stalls which are to be provided. <br />The submitted site plan illustrates 340 surface parking stalls and 10 disabled stalls which is <br />considered adequate. <br /> <br />43
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.