Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 20, 2019 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />City Planner Grittman stated staff would encourage landscaping attention to the east-facing 2 <br />portion of the project to create a more prominent “front door” impression to the most public side 3 <br />of the project. Enhancing the view of the development toward the public side would better meet 4 <br />the expectations of the Silver Lake Village development overall, as well as the expectations for 5 <br />Planned Unit Development design specifically. 6 <br /> 7 <br />City Planner Grittman noted the PUD zoning district does not impose specific structure setback 8 <br />requirements. The setback requirements for R-4 Multiple Family Residential zoning district were 9 <br />reviewed. It is the opinion of staff that the proposed structure setbacks are acceptable. A total of 10 <br />813 off-street parking stalls are proposed on the site which is 115 stalls less than are required by 11 <br />the Ordinance. In consideration of this parking supply deficit, the City would need to allow 12 <br />flexibility from the general ordinance requirement as part of the PUD approval. As a condition of 13 <br />Final PUD approval, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with American Disability Act 14 <br />parking supply requirements. 15 <br /> 16 <br />City Planner Grittman explained that as a condition of Preliminary PUD approval, findings 17 <br />should be made by City Officials that the proposed five-story building height is acceptable as 18 <br />component of a project which meets the intent of the City’s PUD requirements (for superior 19 <br />design and amenities). As part of the review process, emergency services (fire and police) have 20 <br />reviewed the project and made a finding that proper emergency vehicle access is provided. As 21 <br />part of Final PUD approval, the submitted development plans should be subject to review and 22 <br />comment by the Fire Chief. 23 <br /> 24 <br />City Planner Grittman presented the request, noting the number of units for Phase 1 is 230 and 25 <br />for phase 2 is 234 for a total of 464. There will be a total of 57 studio/alcove, 293 one-bedroom, 26 <br />90 two-bedroom, and 24 three-bedroom units. As a condition of Final PUD approval, sample 27 <br />floor plans should be submitted which demonstrate compliance with applicable minimum floor 28 <br />area requirements of the Building Code. The floor plans will be subject to review by the City 29 <br />Building Official as part of building permit review. The apartment building will primarily be 30 <br />finished in varieties of earth tone colors. Colored vertical accents are proposed in strategic 31 <br />locations to add visual interest. The buildings are to be finished in a variety of materials. As a 32 <br />condition of Final PUD approval, details regarding the design of the clubhouse and pool building 33 <br />should be submitted for City review. 34 <br /> 35 <br />As part of the refinement of the landscape plan, it is suggested that consideration be given to 36 <br />accentuating the primary entrance to the site with an intensified landscaping effort. 37 <br />Consideration could be given to providing a landscape median or other enhancement near the 38 <br />eastern entrance to the site, between the garage entrance driveways and the sidewalk crossing to 39 <br />the east. 40 <br /> 41 <br />City Planner Grittman stated the site establishes an impervious surface coverage of 75% of the 42 <br />development property, apart from the parcel on which Salo Park is located. Current impervious 43 <br />on the site is in excess of 90% under the original Walmart use. While the resulting impervious 44 <br />exceeds the R-4 standard, it represents a significant increase in green space over the existing 45 <br />condition. 46