My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12082020
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020
>
CC PACKET 12082020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 2:19:37 PM
Creation date
12/3/2020 2:12:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 8, 2020 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />1. Access-related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City <br />Engineer. The Engineer has approved the access design, subject to final review. <br /> <br />2. In recognition of other development sites within the Silver Lake PUD which were <br />developed at densities less than 40 units per acre, the City finds the proposed <br />residential density (44.7 units per acre) to be acceptable. The Preliminary Plan <br />approval included this finding. <br /> <br />3. The City finds that the proposed 20-foot building setback along 38th Avenue NE will <br />not negatively impact adjacent properties and is therefore considered acceptable <br />(within the context of the PUD). The Preliminary Plan approval included this finding. <br /> <br />4. The City finds that the proposed parking supply (and the deficit based on Ordinance <br />requirements) is adequate to serve the parking demand generated by the proposed <br />apartment building. The Preliminary Plan approval included this finding. <br /> <br />5. The City finds that the limited size of the subject and target tenant base justify an off- <br />street parking supply, which does not include covered spaces (within the context of <br />the PUD). The Preliminary Plan approval included this finding. <br /> <br />6. In consideration if the limited site size and previous site development conditions, the <br />City finds the proposed impervious surface coverage of 76.7 to be acceptable. The <br />Preliminary Plan approval included this finding. It is further noted that the City <br />Engineer and the Watershed District will continue to monitor construction permitting <br />to manage this aspect of the project. <br /> <br />7. Impacts associated with the proposed impervious surface coverage shall be subject to <br />comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. See comment for Item 6. <br /> <br />8. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a lighting plan be submitted for review, <br />which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. A lighting plan has been <br />submitted that meets this condition. The City’s nuisance code specifies a maximum of <br />1.0 footcandles of light at the property line – the proposed plans show less than this <br />(and mostly 0 footcandles) around the property. <br /> <br />9. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a signage plan be submitted for review, <br />which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. The applicant has submitted <br />a signage plan consisting of a single “Blade Sign” along the west (Stinson) frontage – a <br />total of approximately 28 square feet. This sign is within the allowances for wall <br />signage in the R-4 District. <br /> <br />10. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, details shall be provided related to the <br />proposed trash enclosure design. The updated plans show a trash enclosure to be <br />62
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.