Laserfiche WebLink
such, it occupies about a 1/3 of the lot area, thus further reducing the opportunity to provide the - 8 additional <br />parking spaces that are needed. <br />The Minnesota Statutes require that in order for a variance -to be granted, strict application of the provisions of <br />the City's zoning ordinance would cause undue hardship; that the hardship is unique to the property; that the <br />granting of the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; without the variance, the <br />property cannot be put to a reasonable use; and economic hardship alone is not the sole purpose for the <br />variance. Mr. Thompson feels that because the storm water pond is located on site and occupies a large portion <br />of the property, this situation constitutes a unique ,hardship not created by the proposed project. That because <br />of the storm water pond, this project as well as others will find it difficult to provide the needed parking spaces. <br />Staff received a telephone call from one resident requesting more information about the proposed development <br />of the site. <br />Staff finds that the proposed use is allowed in this zoning district and due- to the limited size of the lot, a small <br />office complex may be the best use of this site. It would have light to moderate traffic during business hours, <br />which would not be too disruptive to adjacent multi -family residential neighborhood; landscaping opportunities <br />could soften the commercial feel of area; and the use would require very little in the way of City services, i.e. <br />public safety. <br />Attachments: <br />• Variance Application. <br />• Applicant Letter <br />® Letter from wSB RE: Hydrologic/Hydraulic Calculations and Impacts <br />• Confirmation Letter from Staff <br />Sketch Plans and Elevations. <br />032106 ST Development.doc <br />14 <br />