2010.02.01 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minutes for the Hugo City Council Meeting of February 1, 2010 Page 4 of 8 Approve Ordinance Amending Liquor License Ordinance and Fee Schedule At its March 6, 2000 meeting, the Council approved a resolution approving fees and civil penalties for liquor law violations. City Attorney Dave Snyder and City staff recommend this be addressed as part of Hugo's Municipal Code, Chapter 6 Alcoholic Beverages and Chapter 30 Fee Schedule. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved ORDINANCE NO. 2010-439 AMENDING CHAPTER 6, SECTION 85, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PAYMENT OF PENALITIES FOR LIQUOR LAW VIOLATION, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 30, FEES. Approve Ordinance Amending Tobacco License Ordinance and Fee Schedule At its March 4, 2002 meeting, the Council approved a resolution establishing civil penalties for violations regarding the sale of tobacco. City Attorney Dave Snyder and City staff recommend this be addressed as part of Hugo's Municipal Code, Chapter 38, Article 3 Tobacco, and Chapter 30 Fee Schedule. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved ORDINANCE NO. 2010-440 AMENDING CHAPTER 38, ARTICLE III, SECTION 38-47(C), OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PAYMENT OF PENALITIES FOR TOBACCO LAW VIOLATION, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 30, FEES. Approve Award of Cleaning Contract for Public Works and Fire Hall Buildings At its December 7, 2009 meeting, the Hugo City Council authorized City staff to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for cleaning services for the City's Public Works and Fire Hall buildings. Community Development Assistant Dennis Fields has received a total of six RFP's for the cleaning contract and has reviewed the RFP's and performed reference checks. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the award of the cleaning contract to Jani-King Commercial Cleaning Services for the City's Public Works and Fire Hall buildings. Public Hearing on Ordinance Repealing Storm Sewer Improvement Tax Districts At its September 21, 2009 meeting, Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance to rescind two storm sewer taxing districts after it was determined a builder in the Diamond Point East was unable to combine two parcels in the Diamond Point development because they had different tax codes assigned by Washington County. City staff determined that the lots had different tax codes because of a Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District that was created in 1996. The City has two such taxing districts. District No. 1 was created to address flooding problems in Hugo and May Township and included a joint powers agreement with May Township. This also led to the creation of the Browns Creek Watershed District, which was formerly the Browns Creek Watershed Management Organization, which was not a taxing entity. When this happened, the Storm Sewer Improvement District became irrelevant. District No. 2 is over parcels in the Creekview Preserve Development. The City has never levied a tax in either district. City staff scheduled a public hearing for this evening on this issue. Mayor Fran Miron opened the public hearing, and there were no comments from the public.