Laserfiche WebLink
City Council meeting of June 7, 2004 <br />Page 9 <br />Of particular importance is the railroad crossing issue. The preference is to not construct the crossing <br />and abandon the tracks from County Road 8 to 145h Street, but this is dependent upon the operator <br />(Minnesota Commercial Railroad) providing a commitment that the track is no longer necessary. The <br />commitment has not been provided to date, due to a need to keep the track active until the Schwieters <br />railroad spur issue is resolved. Discussions with John and Joel Schwieters, and the owner of the former <br />Stock Lumber site, have been informative and fruitful, but the spur issue remains unresolved. At this <br />point, the final design for the railroad crossing needs to be initiated to keep the project on schedule. The <br />process would be with the City requesting a cost estimate from Minnesota Commercial Railroad to <br />construct the crossing, which would take 2-3 months to complete. It is likely that there would be a cost <br />to the City related to preparing the estimate, but the exact amount will not be known until after the City <br />makes its request. After the estimate is prepared, the City would need to enter into an agreement to keep <br />the design moving forward, and would begin expending additional funds. The construction would be <br />completely separate from the CSAH 8 project, and would take approximately 12 months to complete <br />following the execution of the agreement. Sandy Cullen outlined the steps needed to be taken in order to <br />have the project ready to let bids in March 2005. <br />Miron made motion, Granger seconded, to schedule a Council workshop to discuss the CSAH 8/14 <br />realignment project and the downtown redevelopment plan for Monday, June 28, 2004, at 7:00 pm. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />REORGANIZATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY <br />At its workshop meeting on May 21, 2004, Council discussed with staff and financial advisor Paul <br />Steinman from Springsted, Inc., the issues relative to the reorganization of the City's Economic <br />Development Authority. Council supported the creation of a separate commission made up of both <br />Council members and citizens -at -large. An EDA was preferred over the Economic Development <br />Commission, but with Council maintaining authority and budget control. Staff was directed to place this <br />issue on this agenda for formal direction to staff, which would include an enabling resolution to provide <br />for formal reorganization of the City Council as the EDA to a Council -citizen makeup of two Council <br />members and five citizens -at -large. City staff requested direction from Council as to its appointment of <br />citizens -at -large and preparation of a draft of the enabling resolution, which provides for the power and <br />responsibilities of the EDA. <br />Puleo made motion, Granger seconded, directing staff to prepare an enabling resolution and <br />development of the EDA Powers and duties, as prescribed in Minnesota Statute. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />REQUEST FROM RCWD TO APPROVE PAYMENT FOR WORK COMPLETED ON JD2 <br />REPLACEMENT PROJECT <br />The City received a payment request from the RCWD for work completed to date on the JD2 culvert <br />replacement project. The work consisted of the replacement of culverts on 157"' Street and 165"' Street. <br />As Council is aware, City staff and City Attorney Dave Snyder have met several times with <br />representatives from the RCWD, Emmons Olivier Resources, and Jay Brothers to reach agreement as to <br />