1994.04.27 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

P.C. Minutes - Aoril 27. l994 Page 2 information from Washington County that septic sites are feasible for ooth parcels. The Brown's Creek Watershed Management Organization has indicated that thev will not require a review of the site prior to granting the SUP. Motion made by Kellison, seconded by Agness to recommend approval of the request of Patrick Gervais, to subdivide 20 acres into two, ten acre oarcels as described above. All aye, motion passed. LaMetti & Sons, 16028 Forest Blvd. No., Hugo, has requested a Special Use Permit to allow River City Asphalt Inc. temporary use their property for operation of a hot mix asphalt plant from May 1, 1994, to October 15, 1994. During this time, RCA will be overlaying Trunk Highway 61, through Washington County and Interstate 35E. LaMetti's property is currently zoned Industrial and under Hugo code, operation of an asphalt plant on this site would be a special use. Richard Carron, River City Asphalt, stated that the plant would be located in the Northeast corner of the site, with temporary access to Highway 61. The plant would be cushioned in sand. He also stated they would clean up the site to the satisfaction of the City and the owner of the property. Jonathan Meisen, representing Hugo 2000, expressed concerns regarding extensive traffic on 8A and felt an alternate route should be determined. Motion made by Kellison, seconded by Schumann to recommend approval of the Special Use Permit request of LaMetti & Sons for River City Asphalt to operate a hot mix asphalt plant on their property at 16028 Forest Blvd., from May 1, 1994 to October 15, 1994, subject to the following conditions: 1. A bond be provided by engineer to guarantee for the restoration. 2. All necessary permits 3. Hours of operation be safety. 4' An alternate route be 5. No other asphalt plant 6. All conditions of the All aye, motion passed. RCA in an amount to be determined by the city restoration of the site and also provide a plan be filed with the City Clerk. approved by the city engineer based on traffic defined and approved by the City. be installed at the Hansen Pit. existing agreement be complied with. This issue was tabled from the March 23, 1994 meeting at the request of the developer in order to determine whether an EAW would be required and other issues were to be addressed. At the Council meeting of April 18, 1994 the City Council required that an EAW be prepared for this development. Under Minnesota rules, a project may not be started and final governmental decision may not be made to grant a permit, approve a project, or begin a project until the Environmental Assessment Worksheet