Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo Planning Commission <br />July 23, 1980 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />LAMETTI & SONS - SITE PLAN APPROVAL <br />The bookkeeper from Lametti was present and stated that the 40 x 300 building would <br />be used for storage of equipment. The poles for the building have already <br />been placed in the ground 13' from the property line. There was discussion as to <br />whether the property was to be considered side yard or rear yard. Peloquin felt <br />that because the buildings faced south and the railroad tracks ran along the east <br />side, the west property line should be considered a side yard. The ordinance reads <br />30' minimum for rear yard setback. Mrs. Caruth owns the abutting property, and <br />Greger felt that her approval would be required prior to the issuance of a Variance, <br />if required. hh <br />Howard Kuusistoel1hat two matters/geladdressed: 1) general direction of the <br />drainage, and 2) first floor elevation of storage building. The representative <br />stated that the land has been graded so that surface water will go the south into <br />a ponding area. The elevation data will be submitted. <br />Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Lorch, that the Site Plan submitted by <br />Lametti & Sons be forwarded to the City Council without recommendation. Let the <br />record show construction of the proposed building was under taken without a <br />building permit in violation of the Hugo City Code. The Planning Commission has <br />no objections to the Site Plan or an application for a rear yard setback variance <br />to conform as indicated in the chart in the Industrial zone. However, the Planning <br />Commission feels the property owner to the west of the property line should noti- <br />fied and have an opportunity to comment prior to any action of the City Council. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Lorch, that the City Council consider <br />notifying the general contractor involved with the construction of the Lametti <br />building of the requirements of the city as far as building permits are concerned. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />Let the record show the appplicant has been informed of the questions asked by the <br />City Engineer relative to direction of surface drainage and 1st floor elevation <br />of the storage building and is to provide this information on his Site Plan prior <br />to the City Council meeting. <br />SHIRLEY NELSON HILL - SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br />Mrs. Hill is contemplating the remodeling of a 40 x 50 building to be used for an <br />on sale liquor establishment and restaurant. An engineer from Consolidated Lumber <br />will be making a recommendation after his review the week of 7/21/80. Mrs. Hill <br />has been unable to make contact with Stan Lynn. His phone has been disconnected and <br />she has had no response to her letters. Her contract for deed will be paid in 1981. <br />Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Peloquin, to table the application until the <br />meeting of August 13, 1980. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />