Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo Planning Commission <br />December 149 1977 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />McAllister made motion, seconded by Peloquin, stating that the only change in the <br />preceding amendments is that the apartment in shop will 500 sq. ft. The rest of the <br />amendment motion reads as stated. <br />VOTUTG FOR: Peloquing Peltier, McAllister, and Ehret <br />VOTING AGAIITST: Grej;�er, Rosenquist <br />Motion Carried. <br />(ORIGINAL MOTION) <br />VOTING FOR: Pel.oquin, Peltier, and McAllister <br />VOTING AGAINST: Greger, Rosenquist, and Ehret <br />Motion Failed. <br />Ehret made motion, seconded by Peltier, that the Planning Commission recommend <br />approval of the request of Safeway House Movers for a Special Use Permit, provided <br />that: <br />1. Evergreens, minimum of 1.0 ft in height, be planted 10 ft on center spacing <br />along the length of 165th Street. <br />2. Seedlings, same spacing, be planted on west side of railroad tracks the length <br />of the property. <br />3. The buildings be parked on the property as described in accampanying drawing. <br />If the bui:dings are not placed on the square as per diagram, the Special Use <br />Permit will be declared null ana void after a period of 30 days. Notice of <br />such to bc: given to property owner. <br />4. That said trees be planted no later than June 30, 1978. <br />5. That all dead trees be replaced within a period of one year. <br />6. !t "1,000.00 irrevocable letter of credit be provided to insure the planting <br />of the trees. <br />7. Proper fire lanes on property be maintained. <br />0. ,tonin,- ordinance be followed as per regulation to residency. <br />7 "'IC, FOR: Peloquin, Peltier, Greger, Rosenquist, McAllister# and Ehret <br />-oticn Carried. <br />^'IAnYt S SETS AT - SUBDIVISION <br />I"r. ;;'_ii:b�.t and Mr. Schvneman were present and indicated on a rough sketch wh^:t <br />they are trying to accomplish. They would like to extend 130th Street eastw-lrd <br />13320 ft, and subdivide 120 acres into 10 acre building sites. The extension will <br />runaon�, the north line of the NVE'- of the: `Afj of Section 33. Peloquin stated that <br />-the cit;► does not accept a cul-de-sac more than 660 ft. He also questioned whetlier <br />road requirenent:, would detract from the minimum lot size. Ehret said that right- <br />of-ways are to be considered as part of the lot size. Ehret stated that currently <br />the city would not allow 132019 however, if it is a preexisting street that would <br />be another matter. <br />Rosenqui3t made motion, seconded by Peltier, that Mr. Shubat bring in more information <br />on proof of existing road. Matter to be tabled until that time. <br />All aye. Motion carried. <br />