Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo planning Commission <br />page 3 of 4 <br />May 26, 1976 <br />areas are ponding water and material to be used for grading the gen- <br />eral area for seeding purposes is difficult to define - owner -operator <br />should appear before the Planning Commission with more definite pro- <br />gram than is being conducted - based on engineering investigation, <br />approval should not be given - suggesting that annual inspection fee <br />deposit should be increased to a total of not less than ;200.00. <br />Indykiewicz says he finished everything he said he would do last <br />year and they have begun taking out the peat and are filling in with <br />sand. It does look a little rough, he said, but it is a problem taking <br />out the peat and getting the sand. They are working on the northeast <br />portion of the property, he said. Concerning the drainage, Spitzer <br />asked if there is any ponding? Indykiewicz said the ditch has been <br />lowered and there is barely any water there now - are planning on putt- <br />ing in three or four feet of fill so that eventually they wont need a <br />ditch. <br />Motion made by Ehret, seconded by Peltier, to recommend to the <br />City Council that the Indykiewicz Mining permit, File No. 1972 -110 -MP, <br />be renewed until June 30, 1977, subject to all the conditions included <br />in Permit Renewal #4 and that the inspection fee be increased to '200 <br />and that the bond and insurance be extended through June 30, 1977, with <br />proof of such being filed with the city; the City Engineer is hereby <br />requested to furnish the City with a letter of clarification regarding <br />the area of ponding prior to the City Council's action on the renewal. <br />Voting for: Spitzer, Ehret, Peloquin and Peltier. Motion carried. <br />LAVALLE EXCAVATING <br />Spitzer read conditions contained in Mining Permit Renewal #2, <br />dated March 21, 1975. <br />City Engineer inspected gravel pit - little change in topography <br />since previous inspection. It nppears that some new excavation is in <br />progress. Upon completion of the removal of materials from the present <br />excavated area, proper slopes would be provided and general clean-up <br />would be completed. <br />Spitzer noted that our records indicate Chet his insurance expired <br />on April 14, 1976. Told to file proof of updated bonding and insurance <br />through June 30, 1977, with the City. <br />Motion made by Ehret, seconded by Peloquin, to recommend to the <br />City Council that the LaValle Mining permit u2 be extended until June 30, <br />1977 subject to all the conditions therein, also subject to the ex- <br />tension of the bond and insurance to expire no earlier than June 30, <br />1977. <br />Voting for: Spitzer, Ehret, Peloquin and Peltier. Motion carried. <br />Meeting Recessed 9:00 F.M. - Reconvened 9:07 P.M. <br />RICHARD SCHUH <br />Spitzer read conditions attached to Schuh's mining permit issued <br />April 5, 1976. Noted that file does not contain proof of insurance. <br />Schuh asked to provide city with the same. <br />City Engineer noted that Schuh pit was examined - hauling is being <br />done on Irish from the pit southerly to County 8A. T:aul area south of <br />pit has been excavated and graded. Calcium Chloride has been applied <br />for dust. No comments will be made by engineer at this time and will <br />depend upon the continuing haul operations. <br />Peloquin asked if the City of Hugo will be using_ all of the stock- <br />pile. Schuh said no. Peltier asked about water control - said Council- <br />