My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1976.12.08 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1976 PC Minutes
>
1976.12.08 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2015 8:52:03 AM
Creation date
3/3/2015 8:49:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
12/8/1976
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br /> December 8, 1976 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Ron Baker - cont. <br /> 3. Request the city to amend its zoning ordinance to Commercial - <br /> Recreational in SPE district . <br /> Greger - I feel whole operation is an intensification. Change from <br /> one non-conforming use to another. <br /> Peltier- What does commercial recreational include, except tavern? <br /> Spitzer - Fisherman terminal. <br /> Ehret - I think we should take a straw vote to see how everyone <br /> feels about the operation, and pursue a way of doing it. <br /> Dave Potter (4394 - 129th Street North) - adjoining property was <br /> present and stated he would rather see the property used as a single <br /> family dwelling. They have a problem with the parking. I • <br /> Spitzer called for a straw vote - Is it your opinion is it in the <br /> best interest of the city to pursue the operation, all or part of <br /> which that is being proposed by Mr. Baker? <br /> Peltier - Yes <br /> Peloquin - Yes <br /> Greger - No <br /> Ehret Yes <br /> Rosenquist - Yes <br /> Gillen - Abstain <br /> Spitzer - matter should be pursued to see if there is a way to see if <br /> we can accomplish what Mr. Baker is looking for. <br /> Rosenquist - To make any kind of rational judgment, we should have a <br /> sketch plan. <br /> Commission voted on each proposal as presented by Mr. Baker. <br /> Yes vote - believe it would not be an intensification as a use as <br /> it now stands. <br /> No vote - would be an intensification <br /> 1. Enlarge existing building to the rea4 te—plla-N44e.eiga4.6eh to <br /> provide space in which to work on motors and boats inside. Beau- <br /> tify each side of tavern building. Yes vote. <br /> 2. Tear down and remove existing cabins and outbuildings. Yes vote . <br /> 3. Beautify fishhouse so it is attractive during off-season. Yes vote. <br /> 4. Fill in rear part of lot so lot is level. Yes vote. <br /> 5. Ii spring, construct 2 worm beds on rear edge of property. Yes vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.