My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2016
>
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2016 4:09:28 PM
Creation date
6/23/2016 12:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
1/13/2016
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Library is very dedicated to customer service, and overall, receives high satisfaction <br />marks from residents. <br />The current mission and vision of the Library/County do not appear to be widely <br />embraced by staff, nor are they driving a direction for the Library. <br />In comparison to peer libraries, the Washington County Library is funded at a rate of <br />$77,000 less annually than national peers, and $410,000 less annually than metro area <br />peers. <br />Washington County uses a system where the Library department pays rent to the <br />County for its facilities. This is an appropriate system, but the peer libraries in the metro <br />area do not have this added, substantial fee. With this rent payment accounted for, the <br />Library's operational resources are even lower in comparison to its metro area peers. <br />The lower funding level translates primarily into fewer staff. The Library has fewer staff <br />on average than peers, and there is some indication of staff burnout, as well as a need <br />for increased professional development opportunities for staff. <br />In comparison to national and Twin Cities peers, the Library is below average in <br />cardholder penetration, number of programs and program attendance. (The disparity in <br />cardholder penetration may be due to Washington County's active purging to remove <br />inactive cards. Other libraries may not manage their cardholder lists in this manner.) <br />In comparison to national and Twin Cities peers, the Library is somewhat above peers <br />and recommended indicators for purchase of print materials. For all collections <br />(including downloadable) it is average to below average in collections budget per capita. <br />In addition to some of the above areas, the SWOT analysis indicated opportunities for <br />more partnerships, expanded programming, and improvements in outreach. Threats <br />and weaknesses included lack of space, internal communication challenges, and <br />splintering off of city libraries outside of the system. <br />The associated but independent libraries in Stillwater and Bayport provide quality library <br />service primarily to the residents in those communities as well as to other County <br />residents. This arrangement is a positive for all County residents but there is disparity of <br />service between these libraries and the rest of the County libraries in the system. <br />Community libraries exist in Newport and Marine -on -St. Croix but are not fully <br />associated libraries. These libraries are supported by the County with the addition of <br />"Express Library" locker services. <br />Lake Elmo has an independent library that is not affiliated with the County system and is <br />not part of the County's taxing district. <br />The associate and independent libraries in Washington County present challenges in the <br />public's understanding of the library as well as disparities in library service standards. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.