My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.05.01 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2017 CC Packets
>
2017.05.01 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 3:43:06 PM
Creation date
5/12/2017 2:54:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
5/1/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for April 17, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />Planner Rachel Juba explained the Excelsior Group, LLC, was proposing to develop 216.6 acres <br />of property, consisting of seven parcels, into 319 single family residential lots and ten outlots to <br />be known as "Adelaide Landing". The Planned Unit Development general plan proposed to <br />rezone the property from Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) to Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD), which would allow flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks. The property <br />included wetlands and floodplain for a total buildable acreage of 146.2 acres. <br />Juba explained that the minimum threshold for a mandatory Environmental Assessment <br />Worksheet (EAW) per MN State Statute is 250 units, therefore, an EAW was required. <br />The developer had worked with City staff to prepare an EAW, which is a document that <br />analyzes, at a preliminary level, the effects a development has on the environment in regards to <br />land use, geology, water resources, wildlife, air, noise, and transportation. The EAW had been <br />sent out for public comment with a 30-day comment period, which ended on March 29, 2017. <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the EAW at its March 23, 2017, meeting, <br />and staff drafted responses to all comments on the EAW, which was sent to all the agencies and <br />others who had commented. The EAW identified areas where potential environmental effects <br />exist and appropriate mitigation measure had been incorporated into the project plan. Staff had <br />analyzed the EAW and plan as it relates to State Rules and found the project did not have the <br />potential for significant environmental impacts; therefore, recommended the City Council <br />approve the findings of fact and conclusions and the resolution approving the issuance of a <br />negative declaration for the need of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). <br />In addition, the proposed project included a proposal to fill 1.32 acres of wetlands associated <br />with the construction of a single family development. The applicant proposed to purchase <br />wetland bank credits at a 2:1 mitigation ratio in -advance of the proposed wetland impacts. The <br />wetland delineation was approved by City staff in 2014 and 2016. The wetland replacement plan <br />application was deemed complete on March 8, 2017, and public notice was sent on March 25, <br />2017, with an April 10, 2017, deadline to receive comments. Rachel explained the applicant's <br />response to the public comment received was compared to the proposed plans/application and <br />found satisfactory by City staff in fulfilling the replacement standards under MN Rules 8420. <br />Ben Schmidt, representing the Excelsior Group, was in attendance and he provided price ranges <br />of the homes and spoke about the positive economic impact to local builders. <br />Council asked questions about the ponds, water reuse, street lighting, road easements, and the <br />buffer on the west side of the pond. Juba clarified the buffer was City owned property and could <br />be used for a future trail connection. <br />Mayor Weidt invited the audience to comment. <br />Bob Creager, 5214 141St Street North, said he was concerned about the lot sizes, water <br />overflowing in the ditches, and an increase in taxes. <br />Lisa Berger 5485 134th Street North, stated she was directly affected by the proposed pond, and <br />asked to keep a large buffer because of standing water on their property when it rains. She was <br />also concerned that water would flow into their property when they build the lots up. She talked <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.