2007.12.17 EDA Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY OF HANOVER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES applies to new construction (including additions) and occupancy changes. MN Rule 1306 applies to the following occupancy classes: A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 (places of assembly); Group B, F, M and S occupancies over 2,000 square feet in floor area or over 3 stories (commercial and industrial); and Group E occupancies of more than 2,000 square feet or two stories and/or daycares designed for 30 or more persons. In addition, the City could consider including either R-1 and R-2 occupancies or R-3 occupancies. Bartels questioned the benefit of MN Rule Chapter 1306 to business owners in Hanover. He stated that the business he works for moved to Hanover for two main reasons; building costs were lower and outdoor storage is allowed in the 1-3 District. Bartels stated that the trade-off is the community is further from the metro area. Bartels noted increased building costs could change that equation. Haugen noted he made a conscious decision to install a fire suppression system when his building was constructed due to the type of product housed. He noted the cost-benefit ratio would vary widely from business to business. Geske provided clarification on Commissioners' questions noting townhomes are not required to have fire suppression systems in most instances but that there are significant requirements for fire walls/separation. He also noted that under MN Rule 1306, Subpart 3 just new construction portions would require suppression, not the entire existing building and that structure separation requirements are addressed within the International Building Code (IBC), which the City has adopted. Urbanski asked Sleypen if he would have expanded his industrial structure, T & S Trucking, if he had been required to install a sprinkler system. Sleypen noted the decision would have been based on the cost of the system and savings over time on insurance premiums. Sleypen noted it would have been a consideration in his decision. Bartels requested clarification of what was driving the consideration of MN Rules 1306 in the City at this time. Franke and Urbanski noted the protection of persons and their property, less exposure of fire fighters to large fires, less time on the scene, and reduction of potential down time and lost revenue for businesses due to a fire. The various types and costs of sprinkler systems were briefly discussed. Geske noted the fire suppression system designer would be responsible for determining the type of system required based on the type of material being protected and type of structure. Bartels asked if the end result could be achieved by an alternate means, which is less prescriptive, such as an ordinance or incentive program. Peterson stated that the issue of whether or not to move forward with Chapter 1306 involves many more interests including business owners, Hanover EDA minutes: August 10, 2006 2