My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 03.23.17
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2017 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 03.23.17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 11:13:08 AM
Creation date
12/10/2018 8:30:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/23/2017
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Carlson Minor Subdivision & CUP <br />CUP Request <br />An existing 20 acre parcel contains a single family home and has an existing driveway, which is <br />proposed to be used to access the proposed 10 acre parcel to the north. A CUP is required for a <br />driveway if it is shared by two or more separate parcels or lots of land. <br />There is steep topography that makes it difficult to find a good location for a new driveway for <br />the proposed parcel to the north. Also there is a significant stand of trees along the west property <br />line that the applicant would like to preserve. Creating a new driveway would require some of the <br />trees to be removed. <br />Staff used these standards to review the application and found that the request meets all <br />applicable standards as follows: <br />1. The proposed use is permissible by law. <br />The proposed use is allowed by conditional use permit. <br />2. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />The proposed use is allowed in the RR zoning district and will keep with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance, which is intended to allow a shared driveway by a CUP as long as they comply <br />with the regulations. <br />3. The proposed use is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of the <br />surrounding area. <br />The use is existing and is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the addition will not alter <br />the character of the area. <br />4. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage treatment <br />facilities. <br />The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, and utilities. <br />5. The proposed use has adequate road access. <br />The property has adequate road access to Homestead Avenue. <br />6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain. <br />The applicant is not proposing to impact any floodplain. <br />7. The proposed use should not increase the potential for flood damage. <br />The proposed use would not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.