Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />3. Reduced Setbacks — the PUD allows reduced front, side, and rear yard setbacks <br />The developer is requesting the amendment to the forth phase to include 63 lots, where 60 lots <br />were previously approved. <br />3. CONTEXT: <br />A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning <br />The properties to the north and west are zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and are <br />occupied by single family homes. The properties to the south are zoned PUD and are occupied by <br />single family homes in the Fable Hills development. The property to the east is zoned Large Lot <br />Single Family Residential and is the City owned Clearwater Creek Preserve Park. <br />B. Natural Characteristics of Site <br />The site is rolling terrain including some trees along the edges, with pockets of wetlands. The site <br />has been previously rough graded. <br />4. ANALYSIS: <br />C. Level of Discretion in Decision Making <br />The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the <br />proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations in the City Code. If it <br />meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. <br />The City has relatively high level of discretion in approving PUD amendments. A PUD <br />amendment must be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City may impose <br />reasonable requirements in a PUD amendment not otherwise required if the City deems it <br />necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. <br />D. Consistency with the PUD and Ordinance Standards <br />Preliminary Plat and PUD <br />There are minor revisions to the plan that include 3 additional units and a slight shift of Fable <br />Hill Road North, adjusting it to the south. The development is required to meet all of the <br />conditions from the previously approved preliminary plat and PUD. The proposed plans meet <br />the intent of the previously approved preliminary plat and PUD. <br />The 63 homes proposed by the developer will result in a net density of 2.49 units per acre. This is <br />less than what would be allowed in a straight zoning single family development (3-4 units per <br />acre) and what would be allowed with a PUD (Up to 4 units per acre). The density is consistent <br />with City requirements. <br />