My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020.01.06 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020 CC Minutes
>
2020.01.06 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2020 1:57:43 PM
Creation date
2/4/2020 1:57:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
1/6/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for January 6, 2020 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br />Administrator Bryan Bear talked about a 10 acre parcel on Goodview Avenue that is subject to a <br />court ordered subdivision. He explained a joint ownership arrangement had fallen apart, and a <br />settlement agreement divided the parcel by court order, but the City had not approved it. Bear <br />explained it is not normal to have a subdivision done by court action, and it was not planned to <br />include City sewer and water, but that would be required by the City. <br /> <br />Erichson talked about the roadway options that were considered during preliminary design. <br />Option 1 consisted of bituminous reclamation and paving at the existing width of 24 feet. Option <br />2 consists of bituminous reclamation and paving with minor shoulder widening of two feet, and <br />would include some ditch work. If the Council chose to widen it to 26 feet, it would first need to <br />be determined if it would qualify as a MnDOT recondition project. The cost of Option 1 is <br />estimated at $1,320,000. Option 2 is estimated at $1,540,000. These project costs include a 10% <br />contingency and 25% indirect costs. Funding for the project would consist of special <br />assessments, City Street CIP Funds, and State Aid Funds. Erichson also presented the option for <br />the extension of sewer saying the cost on that would be $718,000 and would be 100% assessed to <br />the property owners. He explained the City’s Comprehensive Plan proposed utility <br />improvements along Goodview, but it would be premature without development plans. The west <br />side of Goodview could be serviced by sewer but the eastern portion is outside of the <br />Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Erichson talked about the future trail map in the <br />Comprehensive Plan that showed a trail on the west side of the road. He stated this would have a <br />considerable impact with the wetlands, greatly increasing the project cost, and would better be <br />done in the future when utilities are constructed. <br /> <br />Erichson presented the project schedule and recommended the Council schedule the public <br />hearing for February 3, 2020. Construction would begin in the spring and be completed in <br />September, 2020. The assessment hearing was proposed to be held in October, 2020. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the road width and generally agreed on the wider shoulder. Also <br />discussed was the court ordered subdivision. Bear explained the subdivision did not go through <br />the normal process so no utilities were ever discussed. City Attorney Dave Snyder added that <br />the City is fortunate to be able to bring utilities to the site with this road project, but the property <br />owners would need to pay 100%. He said the order had not be finalized by the court, and he <br />expected resolution before Council takes action on the utility extension. <br /> <br />Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2020-7 RECEIVING THE <br />FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2020 <br />GOODVIEW AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. <br /> <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Approve Resolution Approving Rice Lake Reserves Planned Unit Development and <br />Preliminary Plat <br /> <br />Fenway Land Company had requested approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) for a residential development to be generally located on the north side of <br />Egg Lake road, west of the Public Works building and southeast of the Diamond Point East
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.