Laserfiche WebLink
Victor Place <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />PUD amendment and site plan resolution without condition 5.a. which required “The <br />applicant shall mirror the south roof line on the north elevation.” The attached resolution <br />reflects the Planning Commission recommendation. <br /> <br />3. CONTEXT: <br /> <br />A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning <br /> <br />The property is part of the Victor Gardens PUD. The property is guided Commercial and <br />zoned PUD. <br /> <br />The properties to the east and west are guided Commercial and zoned PUD as part of <br />the Victor Gardens PUD. The property to the east is developed with Paws Pet Hospital <br />and the property to west with office/retail including Kinder Gardens childcare center. The <br />property to the south is guided Medium Density Residential, zoned PUD and developed <br />with condominium townhomes. The property to the north (across Frenchman Road) is <br />guided Commercial and zoned C-2 (General Business). The properties are developed <br />with a clinic and daycare. <br /> <br />B. Existing Site Characteristics <br /> <br />The site is generally flat and buildable. There is a wetland on Outlot A that has been <br />delineated, but as of the date of this report has not been approved. <br /> <br />C. Background <br /> <br />In 2004, City approved a PUD amendment and preliminary plat for Victor Gardens 4th <br />Addition. That project approved the 92 unit townhomes to the south, but provided <br />concept plans for the commercial portion of the site only and deferred commercial <br />approvals to a later date. <br /> <br />In 2009, this property was replatted as Victor Gardens Commons with a PUD <br />amendment that approved Paws Pet Hospital (Resolutions 2009-24 and 2009-25). The <br />request showed only a concept plan for this site as part of the Paws approvals. The <br />applicant’s narrative noted that one access was provided for Paws and when Lot 2, <br />Block 1 developed another access would be added across from the private street that <br />serves the townhomes south of Victor Path. Furthermore, the developer indicated that a <br />cross access and parking agreement would be recorded against both lots so that parking <br />would be shared and two accesses would be provided to the project. <br /> <br />4. ANALYSIS: <br /> <br />A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making <br /> <br />The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUD amendments. A PUD <br />must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable