My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 05.28.20
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2020 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 05.28.20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2020 4:21:53 PM
Creation date
8/6/2020 4:16:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
5/28/2020
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Victor Place <br />Page 2 <br />C. Background <br />In 2004, City approved a PUD amendment and preliminary plat for Victor Gardens 4t" <br />Addition. That project approved the 92 unit townhomes to the south, but provided <br />concept plans for the commercial portion of the site only and deferred commercial <br />approvals to a later date. <br />In 2009, this property was replatted as Victor Gardens Commons with a PUD <br />amendment that approved Paws Pet Hospital (Resolutions 2009-24 and 2009-25). The <br />request showed only a concept plan for this site as part of the Paws approvals. The <br />applicant's narrative noted that one access was provided for Paws and when Lot 2, <br />Block 1 developed another access would be added across from the private street that <br />serves the townhomes south of Victor Path. Furthermore, the developer indicated that a <br />cross access and parking agreement would be recorded against both lots so that parking <br />would be shared and two accesses would be provided to the project. <br />3. ANALYSIS: <br />A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making <br />The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUD amendments. A PUD <br />must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable <br />requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote <br />the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. <br />The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the <br />proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. <br />If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan. <br />B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards <br />The Victor Gardens PUD is a compact, mixed -use development consisting of residential, <br />retail, office, and institutional uses. The proposed planning and design approach is <br />commonly referred to as Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND). In short, the <br />design concept includes 1) neighborhoods defined by public spaces, 2) a range of housing <br />types, 3) street designs and pedestrian walkways that keep cars in perspective, 4) <br />architecture that responds to its surrounding and local traditions and 5) a mix of land uses <br />to meet the daily needs of residents. <br />PUD Amendment <br />This property is part of the Victor Gardens PUD, but no formal approvals were ever <br />granted for development of the site. The PUD Amendment and Site Plan are requested <br />for the planned 13,879 square foot office/retail building. <br />The project was reviewed against the Victor Gardens PUD standards, previous <br />approvals and City Land Use Regulations. Staff has been working with the applicant and <br />their development team to develop the plan as it exists today. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.