My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021.09.20 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2021 CC Minutes
>
2021.09.20 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2021 11:36:58 AM
Creation date
12/27/2021 11:36:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
9/20/2021
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for September 20, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />the Consent Agenda approved payment to Peterson Companies, Inc. in the amount of <br />$581,383.57. <br /> <br />Approve Reduction in Cash Escrow for Hugo Gardens <br /> <br />The Hugo Gardens Project had grading and utility work completed to date, and the Hugo <br />Garden Apartments, LLC., had requested a reduction in the cash escrow. The current amount of <br />cash escrow for the Hugo Gardens Project was in the amount of $1,379,797.75. Staff had <br />inspected the work completed to date and recommended approval. Adoption of the Consent <br />Agenda approved the reduction in cash escrow to $1,338,696.47 based on the value of work <br />remaining to be completed. <br /> <br />Approve Short Term Rental Ordinance <br /> <br />Staff had received complaints on a short term rental facility that was advertised on the website <br />Vacation Rentals by Owner (VRBO). Staff had recommended to the City Council that an <br />ordinance be created to clarify whether short term rentals were allowed in the City. The City <br />Council, after the ordinance review committee met, had directed staff to draft an ordinance <br />prohibiting short term rentals in the City. At its September 9, 2021, meeting, the Planning <br />Commission held a public hearing on the ordinance prohibiting short term rentals, and no one <br />spoke. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the ordinance <br />prohibiting short term rentals in the City. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved <br />ORDINANCE 2021-507 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 90, ARTICLE I IN <br />GENERAL, SECTION 90-1 DEFINITIONS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 90, ARTICLE VI <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC USES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, DIVISION <br />I GENERALLY, TO ADD SECTION 90-264 SHORT TERM RENTALS – PROHIBITED. <br /> <br />Approve Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance <br /> <br />At its August 16, 2021, meeting, the City Council authorized staff to revise several ordinances <br />because of inconsistencies and clarifications. One of them was the Adequate Public Facilities <br />ordinance. The Adequate Public Facilities ordinance outlined the public improvement <br />requirements for developments such as road construction, sewer and water, and stormwater <br />management. Staff identified that the ordinance needed minor revisions to clarify what <br />development applications it applied to such as subdivisions and property line adjustment. At its <br />September 9, 2021, meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the <br />ordinance. There was no one that spoke during the public hearing and Planning Commission <br />unanimously recommended to the City Council. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved <br />ORDINANCE 2021-508 AN ORDINANCE REPLACING CHAPTER 90, ARTICLE VII, <br />LAND DIVISION AND PLATTING, SECTION 90-329 ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES. <br /> <br />Approve Authorization for Parks Commission to Evaluate the Park Dedication Fee <br /> <br />At their meeting of September 15, 2021, the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission <br />reviewed the Park Dedication Policy and did not recommended any changes to the policy. The <br />policy continued to be useful and was in keeping with Minnesota State Statute 462.358. The <br />park dedication fee was evaluated in 2010 and 2015 and had remained $2,400 per residential <br />unit. Per state statute, the fee must be based on the fair market value of the property being
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.