My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Parks Packet 10.13.21
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2021
>
Parks Packet 10.13.21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2022 9:04:09 AM
Creation date
1/5/2022 9:03:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
10/13/2021
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
between 2010 and 2020 (attachment 4). The growth -leading communities have been <br />identified on the park dedication fee chart in green. A comparison with cities with a <br />similar growth rate and a comparison with cities with a similar population are shown <br />below. All of the cities below have reaming developable land, which is another <br />important factor to consider. <br />2020 Residential <br />Growth Rate <br />(Per Unit) <br />$1,935 - Single Family, <br />Apple Valley <br />14.8% <br />$3,509.69 - Townhouse, <br />$3,342.50 - Multi <br />Shakopee <br />17.8% <br />$5,340 <br />Hugo <br />18.2% <br />$2,400 <br />Woodbury <br />21.2% <br />$3,500 <br />Blaine <br />22.7% <br />$4,449 <br />Table 1: Fee Comparison in Cities with Similar Growth Rates <br />• <br />'•• • <br />• <br />entiaj <br />'- <br />L$19510 <br />Little Canada <br />10,819 <br />3500 per unit - 1-8 units <br />per unit - 9+units <br />Moundsview <br />13,249 <br />$3,500 <br />Hugo <br />15,766 <br />$2,400 <br />Forest Lake <br />20,611 <br />$2,500 <br />Lino Lakes <br />21,399 <br />$3,160 <br />Table 2: Fee Comparison in Cities with Similar Populations <br />-2- <br />Park Dedication Fee <br />October 13, 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.