My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023.06.12 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2023 CC Minutes
>
2023.06.12 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2024 2:37:01 PM
Creation date
3/18/2024 2:34:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
6/12/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Meeting Minutes for June 12, 2023 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />February, 2023, Council had authorized WSB to complete the draft prospectus to be submitted to <br />the Technical Evaluation Panel to determine if the wetland bank was worth pursuing. In May, <br />2023, the Council approved some funding for additional monitoring work based on the feedback <br />from the TEP. WSB had prepared a cost estimating memo outlining the next steps and a <br />proposal for submitting the prospectus document to the TEP. <br /> <br />The total project area of 123 acres would yield approximately 70 credits of wetland banking <br />credits. She provided a total cost estimate of $568,000-$700,055. This did not include any trail <br />construction but that was estimated at 1.2-2.2 million depending on the need for boardwalks and <br />the final outline. Potential revenue was estimated at the sale of 70 wetland credits, but a more <br />conservative estimate would be 50 credits depending on existing wetlands or if the project did <br />not meet the performance standards. Potential revenue from the sale of credits could be between <br />$2.1. and $6.1 million. Denaway said the TEP was generally supportive of the project, and WSB <br />felt it was appropriate to move on to the next steps <br /> <br />Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve proposal from WSB to develop the North Star <br />Wetland Bank Prospectus in the amount of $55,026. <br /> <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Discussion on Consideration of Cannabis Businesses Moratorium <br /> <br />City Administrator Bryan Bear explained the edibles bill approved by the legislature last year <br />legalized low potency edible products but did not provide framework for regulation. The City <br />had approved a mortarium that would expire in August that prohibited the sale and <br />manufacturing of them. During the 2023 Legislative Session, a cannabis bill was approved to <br />legalize the use, possession, and sale of cannabis products. The legislation was comprehensive <br />and very lengthy. Procession and use would become legal in August of this year, but the sale of <br />these products was likely to be delayed until January, 2025 to allow the state to create the agency <br />to manage licensing and regulations to be known as the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM). <br />After the regulatory framework was establish, the City would need to fit its local responsibility <br />within this framework. In order to allow time for that to occur, the City could put on a new <br />interim ordinance. The interim ordinance may regulate, restrict, or prohibit the operation of a <br />cannabis businesses within the jurisdiction or a portion thereof until January 1, 2025. Before <br />adopting an interim ordinance, the governing body must hold a public hearing. <br /> <br />Miron asked if with the intersection of these two bills, would the currently allowed edibles be <br />licensed by the new state agency. Bear explained there were a few rules that now needed to <br />follow, and there would be more under this bill. Until the OCM is established, they will be <br />under the regulation of the MN Department of Health. He explained the new law required they <br />apply through the state and register with the City if it complied with zoning rules. The new <br />regulations imposed some maximums in zoning controls. The City could impose some <br />requirements for restrictions. <br /> <br />Petryk asked what the fees the City could impose. Bear replied that some cities had been setting <br />their own fee structure for the low potency products. The new legislation put a halt to that and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.