My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024.06.03 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2024 CC Packet
>
2024.06.03 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2024 3:49:14 PM
Creation date
6/14/2024 10:05:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
6/3/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />If the master plan will not ultimately be approved, then it makes no sense to place that parking lot there at such a <br />detriment to those houses. If it is approved, then at least the residents of those houses understand that the parking lot <br />fits within an approved overall site plan that includes public and transparent rationales from the city officials as to why <br />that plan was approved. <br /> <br />As it currently stands, no such transparency exists, and decisions are being made as if an overall site plan will be or has <br />been approved, with no such approval actually in place. <br /> <br />Example #2: Main entrance location <br />This process design and the ensuing uncertainty is also inhibiting the ability of the community to engage with the School <br />on alternative solutions or considerations regarding property development. For example, the School is also calling for <br />their primary entrance for Phase 1 to be placed on Keller Ave, though the master plan eventually has the main entrance <br />to be on 122nd. The 122nd entrance makes significantly more sense for the school logistics, the number of cars, flow of <br />traffic, and community impact. 122nd is the route of travel for the vast majority of their traffic, and it is a commuter <br />school with no planned busing. The current proposal will create a large backup on Keller Ave at peak hours, with <br />potentially hundreds of cars all queuing up at the intersection of 122nd and Keller Ave at concentrated periods of time <br />during the day. In essence, the School is outsourcing their parking queuing onto Keller, where the cars will stop and <br />then proceed onto 122nd. <br /> <br />Placing the main entrance on 122nd allows for the School to incorporate all parking queuing on their own property, vs. <br />backing up traffic on Keller Ave in their current proposal. When approached about the potential to just have the <br />entrance on 122nd to start with, as their master plan calls for, School officials said that if the overall master plan is not <br />approved, then they don’t want the main entrance on 122nd since it would be more expensive and inconvenient for them <br />to build that entrance. <br /> <br />This is another example where not considering the master plan from the beginning will hamper discussions and <br />potentially inhibit or prevent better solutions for both the School and the local community. The process is being run <br />backwards and will ultimately create unnecessary distrust and potentially sub‐optimal decisions in the development of <br />the property. <br /> <br />Proposal <br />My proposal is that the Hugo and May officials determine that the master plan in its entirety needs to be decisioned, <br />and that any Phase 1 developments and construction will not be considered independent or separate of that plan. <br /> <br />This approach seems to me to be simply common‐sense and the appropriate way in which to engage with both the local <br />community and the School. The community will know at the outset what to expect from this development, and will <br />have specific, public, and transparent guidance as to how the respective cities/townships view development in this <br />area. With this information, we will then understand how we can prepare and plan relative to our own properties and <br />lives. Absent this, we will be left in limbo for potentially years as to what this area will become. This isn’t fair nor do I <br />think a completely honest way in which to interact with the community or to discuss plans that would materially <br />transform the area. <br /> <br />The School will also benefit from this transparency and decision. If their master plan is approved, they can go forward in <br />full confidence and proceed as their income, fundraising and donations allow. If it is not approved, they can make the <br />necessary adjustments and create a revised plan. On some of those changes they might prove more willing to consider <br />impact to their neighbors if it turns out they have additional space to work with, or additional guidance on how their <br />overall master plan is viewed by city and township officials.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.