Laserfiche WebLink
ti <br /> • <br /> -2- <br /> NEIL GANOE - MINOR SUBDIVISION <br /> Mr. Ganoe submitted percolation tests and site plan. Percolation <br /> tests were okay. Mr. Ganoe filled out an application but did not <br /> submit his fee. He was told to pay his fee to the City Clerk promptly. <br /> Mr. Ganoe submitted proof of ownership but was told to bring in a copy <br /> of Mr. Kuruths' deed. A single family home is to be built. It was <br /> discussed whether this is within the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning <br /> Commission felt since the existing buildings were so close to the <br /> South lot line of the property that they should not be required to <br /> have five acres or larger. <br /> Motion made by Spitzer, seconded by Rosenquist, recommending that the <br /> minor subdivision be granted to Mr. Kuruth provided that: <br /> 1. All records show that Mr. Kuruth is the present owner of .the <br /> property. <br /> 2. All fees be paid. <br /> 3. That proof of ownership of the original property be filed with <br /> the City Clerk. <br /> 4. That the amount of $50.00 be paid to the City in lieu of park <br /> land dedication. <br /> Members for: Peloquin,, ,Ehret, Spitter, Ras enquist and Schletty. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> BARTON MINING - MINING PERMIT RENEWAL, <br /> No one was present to represent Barton Mining. <br /> Motion made by Spitzer, seconded by Peloquin, that the Barton Mining <br /> Permit renewal should be tabled until the next meeting and the secre- <br /> tary be instzu cted to write a letter to Mr. Kuusisto asking for a <br /> report to be submitted to this Commission. Motion carried. <br /> The Plannicg Commission requests that the Council direct the City <br /> Clerk to advise the Engineer to submit a report on any pertinent <br /> matter coming up. <br /> WARREN CREAGER - MINOR SUBDIVISION <br /> Ehret read application. The Igga.l description on the application was <br /> incorrect. It should be lot 2 of Block One of Arcand Estates. <br /> Mr. Schwab stated that one of the criteria in the ArcaniEstates <br /> Sub division was if they subdivided into small lots they would have <br /> to blacktop the cul-de-sac, and if the Planning Cpmxnission approved <br /> this subdivi si on,they should require Mt. Creager to blacktop the O <br /> -04 <br /> cul-de-sac. <br /> Motion made by Spitzer, seconded by Peloquin, recommending that the <br /> Creager Minor subdivision be denied because it does not fit within <br /> the Comprehensive Plan in that the lots proposed are 1/5 the permis- <br /> sable size. <br />