My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1973.09.20 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1973 PC Minutes
>
1973.09.20 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2015 10:39:02 AM
Creation date
3/4/2015 10:39:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/20/1973
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1^' r <br /> •` -2- • <br /> ••..}`• <br /> :I' <br /> 3�•'w <br /> A question was raised whether mobile homes would be allows:: <br /> l lowsd <br /> in other zoning areas=, or would they be restricted to just <br /> residential areas. Answer - - They would be allowed in <br /> other areas on a temporarybasis. (INemergency . <br /> x cases such ,`+ <br /> i as homes burning, etc. , or for• summer farm help) . <br /> ! <br /> D. rive Acre Minimum Residential Zone - - <br /> Recommended that their be an addition to the ordinance of <br /> a five acre residential district to the proposed zones. <br /> Mr. Dale said there is a large gap between one acre and <br /> twentyacres. This would <br /> provide an intermediate zone. .. <br /> E. Industrial - f <br /> • Referred to a petition received from business owners in <br /> a five block area north or 170th Street to 175th Street <br /> who wished to be zoned commercial instead of agricultural. <br /> • A decision was made to leave this area agricultural until <br /> the business men in this arearov dhow <br /> p i e a plan. on they <br /> are going to develop this area. The village will help <br /> them with this plan if they wish. • <br /> Mr. .Dale recommended an addition to the ordinance of a }4. <br /> i ¶Oonditional Use Permit" for Industrial Area. It's for <br /> requests that cannot be denied but which you can put <br />!p.• <br /> restrictions on, * such as requiring development plans. <br /> li: <br /> ` P. Zoning Map - <br /> YRecommended that the proposed zoningmap <br /> � p po be distributed ,-. <br />.; to the public at the next public hearing. <br /> i <br />•p Pam B3orua suggested that-• everything allowed in 573 under "Per- <br /> mitted Uses" should be allowed j .Conservancy and Agricultural i <br /> districts. Accessory Uses has not beenAihanged. <br /> It was decided to change the ordinance to consider sod farming <br /> the same .as farming so it doesn't get phased out under the non- ,. <br /> conformance use • of open land. <br /> f. Commercial feed lots of 15 cattle per acre for confined feeding .c <br /> was discussed. Under the present' wording, dairy farmers would <br /> yti <br /> not be allowed to confine their cattle in the winter. The fol- <br /> ` lowing additions were suggested s <br /> 1. Any feeding or inclosure operation that .pro•duces a polution *� <br /> problem, the village has the right to request a "Special Use <br /> Permit. <br /> 2. Provide •proof that it is detrimental to general public situ- <br /> ation. <br /> • <br /> Mr. Johnson, Village Attorney, is working on. new wording. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.