Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Many of the changes provide clarity and a more encompassing definition to help prevent <br />unspecified or unknown uses from creating issues in the near future. All uses were <br />reviewed again to ensure clear definitions and clear performance standards if requiring a <br />conditional or interim use permit. <br /> <br />Finally, updates were made specifically to items that are required by the Municipal <br />Planning Act regarding Daycares and Residential Facilities. These changes include <br />updated definitions and clearly allowing them in certain zoning districts as required. This <br />may be as a principal or accessory uses with or without a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />d) Performance Standards <br /> <br />With the consolidation of uses and change to zones, many of the performance standards <br />in the code for specific uses needed updating. This includes re-alphabetizing the <br />standards within their section numbers and updating names to match uses in the zones. <br /> <br />Landscaping was updated to better reflect today’s standards for species list and types of <br />planting, and outdated references, codes, and language was updated. Rather than a <br />limited list of preferred landscape materials, we have added a list of prohibited trees and <br />shrubs. These are invasive or non-native species, have disliked qualities (e.g., smelly and <br />messy seed pods, prolific seeds, robust thorns, etc.) or are vulnerable to pests or other <br />environmental conditions. <br /> <br />Specific performance standards were established for each conditional or interim use and <br />those standards will be evaluated by the City during the review processes. <br /> <br />The changes to the Code appear significant due to the amount of text moving around and <br />new section numbers, however, many sections of text remained largely unchanged. A <br />repeal and replace provided the cleanest way to adopt the proposed code changes to <br />Chapter 90. <br /> <br />e) Multi-Family Design Guidelines <br /> <br />The current Multi-Family Design Guidelines were adopted in December 2005 and have <br />been used by Staff when developers in Hugo have proposed different types of multi-family <br />housing. This update is to modernize language, examples, images, and to provide <br />additional clarity for what types of multi-family housing are preferred in Hugo. <br /> <br />Guidelines are not adopted as part of the City Code and therefore do not have the same <br />level of authority or regulation. However, the City does choose to use these to <br />communicate preferences for development. Additional requirements found in the <br />guidelines are encouraged to be incorporated into development proposals, but the City <br />and the developer have flexibility with the guidelines that do not exist when applying the <br />City Code. The City should accept these guidelines so that all who use them are clear on <br />what they should and should not propose for a multi-family housing development. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />