1987.06.01 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Me. June 1, 1987 the requests followed:by a split vote, and the motion for approval failed. Because the requestsfor SUP/variance were not denied, the applicant was able to bring these matters before the Council for further consideration. Mr. Wunderlich provided the Council with a better site plan and a more detailed analogy for the need for the variance. Motion made by Peltier, Vail seconded, to approve the SUP and variance for William Wunderlich to allow for the construction of a 40' x 48' accessory building which would exceed the 3,600 square feet allowed, between the house and Ingersoll Avenue. The property is generally described as part of Section 14, T31N, R21W aka 15939 Ingersoll Avenue. The approval is subject to the following 12 special conditions: 1. Any and all conditions of this SUP must be met within 90 days, unless otherwise stipulated in this permit. If these conditions are not met,this permit will be null and void. 2. A building permit must be applied for within 120 days of permit approval, and substantial construction of any building or improvements must be underway within 120 days of permit issuance. 3. Property lines must be identified on site by the applicant to assure proper setbacks when buildings are to be constructed. 4. Any commercial or industrial use of said property, not specifically permitted in the zoning district by the city zoning ordinance, shall be strictly prohibited. 5. All driveways built over ditches or drainage areas must include installation of a 15" corrugated metal culvert installed in a manner acceptable to the city. 6. No building permits will be issued until the required permits are secured from the appropriate watershed district, where applicable. 7. No significant deviations from the approved site plan shall be permitted unless reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council, followed by an amended SUP. 8. All fees relating to the issuance of this permit shall be paid by the appli- cant including the cost of recording this permit with Washington County. 9. Any exterior storage on site relating to activities of this SUP must be con- fined to a fenced area approved by the city. Said fencing to be constructed in a manner that will allow for screening from view of the general public. 10. No fences, structures, or vegetation may be placed in on-site easements. 11. Activities on site will not cause the altering of any watercourse, ditch, or drainage system. 12. Property owner will provide access to the site for periodic inspections to insure complaince with the SUP. VOTING AYE: Peltier, Olson, Vail VOTING NAY: Potts, Atkinson Motion Carried. 8.A Request for Minor Subdivision (DesLauries/Iverson) Messrs. Ron DesLauries and John Iverson have made application to the City of Hugo to subdivide a 34.82 acre tract of land in an agriculture zone into three lots. Mr. DesLauries has requested waiver of the formal subdivision requirements, and has indicated that the preliminary survey will be revised to reflect his request. The property in question is described as all that part of the SW4 of the NW1, Section 30, T31N, R21W, Washington County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the centerline of