1986.10.06 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

/ / 1Z October 6, 1986 MOTION: Schwab made motion, Potts seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION 1986-19, A RESO- LUTION REDUCING BY $28,600.00 THE TAXES LEVIED FOR COLLECTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT BONDS. All Aye. Motion Carried. MOTION: Potts made motion, McAllister seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION 1986-20, A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR PROJECT 8102 IN THE BALD EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PARK. All aye. Motion Carried. MOTION: Peltier made motion, Schwab seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION 1986-21, A RESO- LUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS FOR PLACEMENT ON THE 1987 TAX ROLLS. All aye. Motion Carried. CITY ADMINISTRATOR This segment of the meeting was reserved for interviewing the three finalists for the City Administrator position: Ken Huber, Monte Eastvold, and Mark Nagel. MOTION: McAllister made motion, Hauer seconded, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract between Mr. Ken Huber and the City of Hugo with the following information being inserted in the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT: $33,400.00 salary, 4.25% retirement, 10 days vacation, 10 sick days (vacation and sick days per year during life of contract), six months severance pay, and $500.00 relocation expenses. Should Mr. Huber reject the contract, Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to offer and execute a contract with Mark Nagel. VOTING FOR: Hauer, Schwab, McAllister VOTING AGAINST: Peltier, Potts Motion Carried. MOTION: McAllister made motion, Hauer seconded, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract between Mr. Mark Nagel and the City of Hugo withthe following information being inserted in the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT: $32,000 salary, 4.25% retirement, 10 days vacation, 10 sick days (vacation and sick days per year during life of contract), and six months severance pay. VOTING FOR: Hauer, Schwab, McAllister VO'T'ING AGAINST: Peltier, Potts Motion Carried. HARSTAD AND ASSOCIATES Mr. Wedell, representing Harstad & Associates, was present to discuss concerns he has regarding their proposed development in the City of Hugo.. Mr. Wedell stated that his firm has no problem with the City developing the specs for the city improvements, but inquired whether that could work with the City Engineer as to the developer they would utilize rather than the bid process. The City Engineer would remain the inspection authority. For the record, it was the consensus of the Council that at the appropriate time, the City Engineer will design the specs and contract documents for all public improvements in HUGO MEADOWS. Harstad and Associates will then seek bids from private contractors, subject to City Engineer approval.